Evaluation of Efficiency of SDS and Tween 20 Surfactants on Refining of Diesel Contaminated Clay Using Electrokinetic Process and Determination of Compressive Strength of Clay after Removal of Contaminant

Authors

1 Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Earth Resources Engineering, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Technical Inspection Engineering, Abadan Faculty of Petroleum, University of Petroleum Industry, Abadan, Iran

Abstract

In the present era, environmental pollution is a global crisis, increasing population growth and urban development, industrial expansion and unlimited use of natural resources, are among the increasingly important factors of pollutants (Reilley, 1996). Vocciante (2021) found in the study of stability in electrokinetic modification processes that the electrokinetic method is suitable for cleaning inorganic pollutants from clay. Zhou (2021) found that using the electrokinetic method is effective in removing heavy metals zinc, cadmium, and manganese from the soil and leads to the removal of about 72% of the pollutant from the soil sample. Vaishnavi (2021) in the study of bio-electrokinetic modification of diesel-contaminated environment with biosurfactant found that this method is an effective method for cleaning and cleaning soils contaminated with diesel hydrocarbons. Hanaei et al. (2021) found that the direct shear test showed that the adhesion of the soil sample increased and the friction angle decreased after oil contamination, and the permeability test showed that the contamination of the soil sample decreased the permeability of sandy soil and this change It is a function of the amount of oil and the viscosity of oils.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Acar YB, Alshawabkeh AN, “Principles of electrokinetic remediation”, Environmental Science and Technology, 1993, 27 (13), 2638-2647.
https://doi.org/10.1021/es00049a002
ASTM D 2166, Standard Test Method for The uniaxial test, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1520/D2166-06
ASTM D 422, Standard Test Method for Hydrometric test, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1520/D0422-63R07
ASTM D 4318-93, Standard Test Method for Atterberg test, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1520/ D4318-17
ASTM D 698, Standard Test Method for Compaction test, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1520/D0698-12
Bahemmat M, Farahbakhsh M, Kianirad M, “Electrokinetically enhanced remediation of contaminated soil with Ni by use of humic acid and fulvic acid”, In: Proceedings of 12th Iranian Soil Science Congress, 3-8 September, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran, 2011.
https:// doi.org/10.22059/ijswr.2012.24353
Barba S, Villaseñor J, Rodrigo MA, Cañizares P, “Effect of the polarity reversal frequency in the electrokinetic-biological remediation of oxyfluorfen polluted soil”, Chemosphere, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.03.002
Berg MS, Webester MT, “Release of petroleum hydrocarcon from bioremdiationed soil”, Journal of Soil Contamination, 1998, 7, 675-695.
     https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090025X(2001)5:2(78)
Boulakradeche OM, “Enhancement of electrokinetic remediation of lead and copper contaminated soil by combination of multiple modified electrolyte conditioning techniques”, School Laboratory of Hydrometallurgy and Molecular Inorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Sciences and Technology Houari Boumediene, Algeria, Environmental Engineering Research, 2022, 27 (4), 210167.
https:// doi.org/10.4491/eer.2021.167
Cameselle C, “Enhanced electrokinetic remediation for the removal of heavy metals from contaminated soils”, Department of Chemical Engineering, BiotecnIA, University of Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain, Applied. Sciences. 2021, 11, 179.
      https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041799
Eykholt GR, Daniel DE, “Impact of system chemistry on electroosmosis in contaminated soil”, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1994, 120 (5), 797-815.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)07339410(1994)120:5(797)
Farahbakhsh M, “The effect of PH on electrokinetic modification of a microstructure contaminated with crude oil”, Iranian Soil and Water Research, Volume 49, Number 3, August and September 2017, 483-491. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijswr.2017.38715.666902
Gidudu B, “Application of biosurfactants and pulsating electrode configurations as potential enhancers for electrokinetic remediation of petrochemical contaminated soil”, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Pretori, 13 July 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145613
Hamidi A, Karimi AH, “Effect of phytoremediation on compression characteristics of silty clayey sand contaminated with crude oil”, International Journal of Civil Engineering, 2021, 19 (8), 973-995. https://doi.org/10.1080/15320383.2021.1900065
Hanaei F, Sarmadi MS, Rezaee M, Rahmani A, “Experimental investigation of the effects of gas oil and benzene on the geotechnical properties of sandy soils”, Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 2021, 6 (2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.31272/jeasd.27.3.1
Hosseini A, Hajiani Boushehrian A, “Laboratory and numerical study of the behavior of circular footing resting on sandy soils contaminated with oil under cyclic loading”, Scientia Iranica, 2019, 26 (6), 3219-3232. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2018.5427.1267
Joukar A, Boushehrian AH, “Experimental study of strip footings rested on kerosene oil-and gas oil-contaminated sand slopes”, Iranian Journal of Science and Technology-Transactions of Civil Engineering, 2019, 44 (1), 209-217.
https://doi.org/10.22107/jpg.2023.417661.1210
Khataei B, “Removal of crude oil from soil using electrokinetic method improved with surfactants”, 2016, 33-2 (1-2), 107-114.
      https://doi.org/10.24200/j30.2017.4544
Lambet P, Fingas M, Goldthorp M, “An Evaluation of field total petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated soil by composting in biopiles”, Environment Pollution. 2001, 409-411.
      https://doi.org/10.22059/ijswr.2017.38715.666902
Lisbeth M, Thomas H, Pernille E, Jensen Gunvor M, “Electrokinetics applied in remediation of subsurface soil contaminated with chlorinated ethenes A review”, Chemosphere 235, 2019, 113-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.06.075
López-Vizcaíno R, “Calcite buffer effects in electrokinetic remediation of clopyralid-polluted soils”, et al Electrochimica Acta, 225, 2017, 93-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2018.11.034
Nasiri A, “The effect of time and ph on improving the effciency of the electrokineticmethod for remediation of the soil contaminated by chromium”, M.Sc Student, Dept. of Mining, Faculty of Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran , Journal of Mineral Resources Engineering, 21 Apr 2019.
https://doi.org/10.30479/jmre.2019.9945.1213
Pamukcu S, Wittle JK, “Electrokinetically enhanced in situ soil decontamination. In, D. L. Wise and D. J. Trantolo (Eds.) Remediation of Hazardous Waste Contaminated Soils”, (p.p. 245-298), Marcel Dekker, New York, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)07339410(1996)122:8(666)
Pamukcu S, Weeks A, Wittle JK. “Electrochemical separation and stabilization of selected inorganic species in porous media”, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1997, 55, 305-318, http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9780203740880-13
Reddy KR, Saichek RE, “Enhanced electrokinetic removal of phenanthrene from clay soil by periodic electric potential application”, Journal of Environmental Science and Health part A Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering, 2004, 39 (5), 1189-1212.
http://doi.org/10.1081/ESE-120030326
Reddy KR, Saichek RE, “Effect of soil type on Electrokinetic removal of phenanthrene using surfactants and cosolvents”, Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2003, 129 (4), 336-346.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)07339372(2003)129:4(336)
Reilley KA, Banks MK, Schwab AP, “Organic chemicals in the environment: dissipation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the rhizosphere”, Journal Environmental Quality, 1996, 25, 212-219. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1996.00472425002500020002x
Saichek RE, Reddy KR, “Electrokinetically enhanced remediation of hydrophobic organic compounds in soils: A review”, Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2005, 35 (2), 115-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10643380590900237
Saichek RE, Reddy KR, “Effect of Ph control at the anode for the electrokinetic removal of phenanthrene from kaolin soil”, Chemosphere, 2003, 51, 273-287. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.19437870.0000203
Saini A, Bekele DN, Chadalavada S, Fang C, Naidu R, “Areview of electrokinetically enhanced bioremediation technologies for PHs”, Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2020, 88, 31-45. https://10.1016/j.jes.2019.08.010
Schwab AP, SU J, Wetzel S, Pekarek S, Banks MK, “Extraction of petroleum hydrocarbons from soil by mechanical shaking”, Environmental Science and Technology, 1999, 331940-1945.
https://doi.org/10.1021/es9809758
Seyed Razavi SN, Khoda Dadi A, Ganji doust H, “Removal  of crude oil from soil by biosurfactant treatment  of  soil contarninated  with crude-oil using biosurfactants”, 2011, 37 (60), 107-116.
https://doi.org/ 10.5897/JPGE11.044
Shapiro AP, Probstein RF, “Removal of contaminant from saturated clay by electroosmosis”, Environmental Science and Technology, 1993, 27 (2), 283-291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es00039a007
Sun Y, “In situ electrokinetic (EK) remediation of the total and plant available cadmium (Cd) in paddy agricultural soil using low voltage gradients at pilot and full scales”, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Ecosystems and Environment Research Programme, University of Helsinki, Niemenkatu 73, FI-15140 Lahti, Finland, Science of the Total Environment, 785, 2021, 147277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147277
USEPA, “A resource for MGP site characterization and remediation”, EPA/542-R-00- 005, Washington, DC, 2000. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/201508/documents/mgp_chap1-4a.pdf
Ukleja J, “Stabilization of landslides sliding layer using electrokinetic phenomena and vacuum treatment”, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Geosciences, 25 July 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10080284
Vaishnavi J, “Biosurfactant mediated bioelectrokinetic remediation of diesel contaminated environment”, Chemosphere, 2021, 264 (1), 128377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128377
Vocciante M, “Sustainability in electrokinetic remediation processes: a critical analysis”, Department of Chemistry and Industrial Chemistry, University of Genova, 16146 Genova, Italy, Sustainability 14 January 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020770
Yongsong Ma, Xi Li Hongmin Mao, Bing Wang B, Peijie Wang P, “Remediation of hydrocarbon-heavy metal co-contaminated soil by electrokinetics combined with biostimulation”, Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.07.131
Zhou JL, “Effective remediation of heavy metals in contaminated soil by electrokinetic technology incorporating reactive filter media”, Science of The Total Environment, 2021, 794, 148668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148668
Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Volume 53.4, Issue 113 - Serial Number 113
Winter of 2024
February 2024
Pages 179-190

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics