Experimental Study of the Horizontal Thin Layer Effect on the Bearing Capacity of Circular Footings Resting on Sand

Authors

1 Civil Engineering Department, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Civil Engineering Department, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

Abstract

In general, despite their seeming insignificance, there are some details in the ground that have significant effects on soil-foundation system behavior such as slip surfaces, shear bands, and thin layers (Valor et al. 2017). Terzaghi (1929) termed “these features minor geologic details and pointed out their enormous potential effects on the safety of dams”. In the literature review very little study has been performed on the effects of a thin layer (Valor et al. 2017, Ziccarelli et al. 2017, Oda and Win, 1990)
In the present paper, the influences of the horizontal thin layer on the ultimate bearing capacity of the circular foundation resting on the sandy bed were studied by implicating a small-scale physical model for the soil-foundation system. The problem of the soil- circular footing system is schematically illustrated in Fig. 1. The problem is investigated under the axisymmetric condition, and the circular foundation is rigid. This foundation rests on the ground surface, on the other hand, the initial depth of embedment is nil. The studies were performed by the material type, thickness, and depth of the thin layer variation. For the bed sand, crushed uniform silica sand (SP) with medium density was used. For the thin layer, materials with different strength properties (strong and weak) in comparison with the sandy bed were used.
For the weak layer, the clay powder with CL classification was used. Clay with a natural moisture content of 5.5% and a very low density of 12.1 kN/m3 was used consistently in all of the experiments.
For the strong layer, a fine-grained asphalt mixture with an unconfined compressive strength of 1460 kPa and unit weight19.12 kN/m3 was used.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

American Society of Testing and Materials, D 3080-04, “Standard test method for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained conditions”, West Conshohocken, PA, 2010.
American Society of Testing and Materials, D 854-05, “Standard test method for specific gravity of soils solids by water pycnometer”, West Conshohocken, PA, 2005.
American Society of Testing and Materials, D 2216-05, “Standard test method for laboratory determination of water (moisture) content of soil and rock by mass”, West Conshohocken, PA, 2005.
American Society of Testing and Materials, D 2487, “Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purpose (Unified soil classification system)”, West Conshohocken, PA, 2006.
American Society of Testing and Materials, D 4254-00, “Standard test methods for minimum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative density”, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004b.
American Society of Testing and Materials, D 4253-00, “Standard test methods for maximum index density and unit weight of soils using a vibratory table”, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004a.
Bolton MD, Lau CK, “Scale effects in the bearing capacity of granular soils”, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1989, 2, 895-898.
Das, BM, “Principles of foundation engineering”, Eighth Edition, PWS Publishing Company, Pacific Grove, USA, 2016, 946.
Martin CM, “Exact bearing capacity calculations using the method of characteristics”, Proceedings of the 1th International Conference of the International Association for Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics, Turin, Italy, 2005, 4, 441-450.
Meyerhof GG, “Some Recent Research on the bearing capacity of foundations”, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1963, 1 (1), 16-26.
Murthy VNS, “Geotechnical Engineering”, Taylor & Francis Inc., 2002.
Oda M, Win S, “Ultimate bearing capacity tests on sand with clay layer”, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1990, 116 (12), 1902-1906.
Poulos HG, “Pile behavior- consequences of geological and construction imperfections”, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2005, 131 (5), 538-563.
Taylor RN, “Centrifuges in modelling: principles and scale effects”, In Geotechnical Centrifuge Tecnology (Taylor RN, (ed.)), Blackie Academic and Professional, London, UK, 1995, 19-33.
Terzaghi K, “In geology and engineering for dams and reservoirs”, American Institute of Mining and Metallurgical Engineers, Technical Publication 215, 31-44, 1929, Reprinted in Terzaghi, K. From Theory to Practice in Soil Mechanics: Selection from the writings of Karl Terzaghi. Wiley, Hoboken, N.J, USA, 1960, 119-132.
Terzaghi K, Presidential Address. Proceedings, 1st International Conference on Soil Mechanics Foundation Engineering, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass, 1936, 3, 13-18.
Toyosawa Y, Itoh K, Kikkawa N, Yang JJ, Liu F, “Influence of model footing diameter embedded depth on particle size effect in centrifugal bearing capacity test”, Soils and Foundations, 2013, 53 (2), 349-356.
Ziccarelli M, Valore C, Muscolino SR, Fioravante V, “Centrifuge tests on the strip footings on sand with a weak layer”, Geotechnical Research, 2017, 4 (1), 47-64.
Valore C, Ziccarelli M, Muscolino SR, “The bearing capacity of footings on sand with a weak layer”, Geotechnical Research, 2017, 4 (1), 12-29.
Vesic AS, “Analysis of ultimate loads of shallow foundations”, Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, Journal of American society of civil engineers, 1973, 99 (SM1), 45-73.
Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Volume 53.1, Issue 110 - Serial Number 110
Spring 2023
May 2023
Pages 67-76

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics